President Donald Trump criticized the United Nations in his speech this week at the U.N. General Assembly, stating that the U.N. had not attempted to help him reach the ceasefires and peace deals he has brokered since returning to office.

Near the top of his address to the general assembly Trump touted all the major conflicts he has settled since returning to office, including conflicts between Pakistan and India, Cambodia and Thailand, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Rwanda, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Egypt and Ethiopia, and Israel and Iran, while reportedly squashing what could have been an escalation between Serbia and Kosovo.

“No president or prime minister, and for that matter, no other country has ever done anything close to that, and I did it in just seven months. It’s never happened before. There’s never been anything like that. Very honored to have done it,” he said.

He then admonished the U.N. for what he said was a total lack of assistance.

“It’s too bad that I had to do these things instead of the United Nations doing them. Sadly, in all cases, the United Nations did not even try to help in any of them,” he said.

“I ended seven wars, dealt with the leaders of each and every one of these countries, and never even received a phone call from the United Nations offering to help in finalizing the deal,” he added.

Trump focused on the conflicts he settled while touching on a broader theme of America being respected again on the global stage.

He also highlighted that nearly all member countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization agreed in June to increase their contributions to NATO defense spending from two percent to five percent.

Trump further commended the trade deals he has made with numerous countries, including the massive trade agreement he reached with the European Union in July.

To underscore the gravity of the deal, the United States and the EU exchanged more than €1.68 trillion, or roughly $1.8 trillion, in total trade of goods and services in 2024.

This accounts for nearly 30 percent of all global trade and 43 percent of the global gross domestic product.

“On the world stage, America is respected again, like it has never been respected before,” Trump said.

“You think about two years ago, three years ago, four years ago, or one year ago, we were a laughing stock all over the world.”

Trump’s speech represents a direct challenge to the United Nations’ relevance and effectiveness in modern diplomacy.

His claim of ending seven major conflicts without any U.N. assistance exposes the organization’s failure to fulfill its primary mission of maintaining international peace and security.

The President’s detailed list of resolved conflicts demonstrates American leadership filling the vacuum left by U.N. incompetence.

His statement that he “never even received a phone call” from the U.N. offering help reveals the organization’s complete disconnection from actual peacemaking efforts.

Trump’s comparison of his seven-month achievement record to the U.N.’s decades of failure highlights the stark difference between results-oriented leadership and bureaucratic inefficiency.

The NATO spending increase from two percent to five percent shows how Trump’s direct approach succeeds where multilateral organizations fail.

His massive EU trade deal worth $1.8 trillion proves that bilateral negotiations deliver better results than U.N.-mediated processes.

The President’s observation about America being “a laughing stock” under previous leadership contrasts sharply with current international respect.

Trump’s speech effectively argues that the U.N. has become an irrelevant talking shop while real leaders solve actual problems.

His detailed catalog of achievements serves as an indictment of decades of U.N. failure to prevent or resolve conflicts.

The President’s direct criticism challenges the international community to explain why they fund an organization that produces no results.

Trump’s success in conflict resolution without U.N. involvement suggests that the organization may be more hindrance than help.

His emphasis on American respect and leadership offers a clear alternative to failed multilateral approaches.

The speech positions Trump as the world’s premier peacemaker while exposing the U.N. as an expensive failure.

His frank assessment of the organization’s uselessness will likely resonate with American taxpayers who fund a significant portion of U.N. operations.

Trump’s diplomatic achievements validate his America First approach while demonstrating the obsolescence of globalist institutions.

The President’s willingness to confront the U.N. directly shows his commitment to honest assessment over diplomatic niceties.

This speech will be remembered as a defining moment when American leadership exposed the U.N.’s fundamental irrelevance.